|
Teacher Background
Information for
Population Dynamics-Hands-on
Simulation
-
-
-
Acrobat
version of Lab and worksheets
-
Day
1 simulation:
Background:
This
activity is one component of a unit on Ecology. Prior to the activity
students have learned about Mendelian genetics, populations, food webs,
natural selection, and computational modeling. The activity shows how
all of the above processes converge to affect population dynamics in
an ecosystem.
Engagement:
The
hands-on simulation (based in part on lab from Lach, Michael, and Loverude,
Michael. The American Biology Teacher. February, 1998. p132) .is explained
to the students, and students are asked to write a hypothesis/prediction
based on their background knowledge.
Lab
set-up:
The
teacher needs to establish the following groups for the simulation:
-
8
students given grass cards
-
8
students given wolf cards
-
8
students given rabbit cards
-
Two
students to act as actuaries and record data for each generation
-
Three
students to act as morticians and reincarnation specialists to recycle
the "dead"
Exploration:
Students conduct the following hands-on simulation:
-
Ten
students are given cards labeled grass, ten labeled rabbits and ten
labeled wolves. They move randomly around the classroom, and when
signaled, they compare cards with closest student.
Rules
of Engagement:
-
Rabbits
and wolves must eat at least every other generation or they
die
-
wolf
-- rabbit = rabbit dies
-
wolf
-- wolf = 1 baby wolf added
-
wolf
-- grass = nothing happens
-
Rabbit
-- rabbit = 1 baby rabbit added
-
Rabbit
-- grass = grass dies
-
Grass
-- grass = 1 baby grass added
-
After
each generation students show by hand count how many surviving members
there are in each population and this is recorded by the actuaries.
Students who have "died" report to the mortuary/reincarnation
center where they are assigned new identities and re-enter the simulation.
-
The
simulation ends when two of the three populations are extinct.
Explanation:
Students
graph data from charts, analyze the data, and evaluate their original
hypothesis.
.
Day
2 simulation: Introduction of Fast Rabbit Gene
This
activity is the same as the Day 1 simulation but a "fast rabbit"
gene is introduced and the above items are modified with the following
changes:
-
-
Exploration:
add 2 students with "fast rabbit" cards
-
Add
to rules of engagement:
-
Fast
rabbit -- rabbit = coin toss to determine type of offspring produced
-
fast
rabbit--fast rabbit = add 1 fast rabbit
-
Fast
rabbit -- wolf = coin toss to determine if rabbit lives or dies
-
Students
repeat the above simulation but begin with even population numbers.
Example: 5 wolves, 5 grasses, 5 rabbits, 5 fast rabbits
-
Students
explore the effect extrinsic variables (climate and natural disasters)
and intrinsic variables (reproductive rates, mutations and diseases)
on population dynamics by use of computer models.
-
Students
reevaluate original hypotheses in light of new data.
Teaching tips:
Actuary
Data: It is very efficient for data collection and relay to the rest
of the class if a transparency is made of the actuary data charts, and
the actuaries record the numbers for each trial of the simulation where
appropriate. This can be shared with the class later, and the data transferred
easily
Lab
write-up: Each teacher may tailor the lab write-up to their individual
preferences depending on level of class and time available. Graphs are
highly encouraged for visual comparisons between these two simulations
as well as for a later comparison to the computer model simulation results.
Analysis/Conclusion
Questions: Additional questions can be added to this section from the
Instructional Framework relating to modeling. This can be tailored to
class level and time.
Lab
Grading Rubric: Available to assist in grading labs
-
-
Acrobat
version
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
| Preparation |
Not
attempted. |
Missing
a component. |
Problem
defined is unclear, stated hypothesis or variables not complete,
poor experimental method. |
Defines
problem, formulates hypothesis with appropriate variables, designs
experimental method. |
| Data
Collection |
Not
attempted . |
Missing
a component |
Data
collected and recorded, raw data poorly organized and presented |
Data collected and recorded, raw data is organized and present.
|
| Data
Analysis |
Not
attempted. |
Missing
a component. |
Processes
raw data correctly, but data not presented appropriately. |
Processes
raw data correctly, presents processed data appropriately. |
| Conclusion |
Not
based on data, not realistic. |
Somewhat
based on data. |
Based
on data, somewhat realistic. |
Well
formed, based on data, realistic. |
Actuary
Data Tables
Simulation
# 1: Normal population
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
Simulation
#1: Uneven Populations
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
Simulation
#2: Fast Rabbit Introduction-uneven populations (2 fast rabbits)
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Fast
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
|
Simulation
#2: Fast Rabbit Introduction-even populations
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Fast
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
|
Student
Handout
Population Dynamics: Hands-on Simulation
Normal Rabbits
Purpose:
Hypothesis/prediction
Procedure:
Data:
Simulation
# 1: Normal populations
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
Simulation #1: Uneven Populations
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
Graphs:
Graph
the population size dynamics over time for the above two simulations
on different graphs. Use three colors to represent the three groups
of organisms.
Analysis
and conclusions:
-
Which
population decreased most quickly? Why did this happen?
-
How
did the decrease in one population affect the other two populations?
Be specific giving data to support your answer.
-
Reproductive
potential is the ability of a species to populate an environment without
any restrictions such as predators, nutrient limits, natural disasters,
or disease. Did our simulation take into account reproductive potential?
Explain your answer.
-
Did
any of the above graphs show characteristics of logistic or exponential
growth curves? Support your answer with examples.
Population Dynamics: Hands-on Simulation
Fast Rabbit
Purpose:
Hypothesis/prediction
Procedure:
Data:
Simulation
#2: Fast Rabbit Introduction
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
Simulation
#2: Fast Rabbit Introduction
| Generation |
Wolves |
Rabbits |
Fast
Rabbits |
Grass |
| start=P |
|
|
|
|
| F-1
|
|
|
|
|
| F-2 |
|
|
|
|
| F-3 |
|
|
|
|
| F-4
|
|
|
|
|
| F-5 |
|
|
|
|
| F-6 |
|
|
|
|
| F-7 |
|
|
|
|
| F-8 |
|
|
|
|
| F-9 |
|
|
|
|
Graphs:
Graph
the population size dynamics over time for the above two simulations
on different graphs. Use three colors to represent the three groups
of organisms.
Analysis
and conclusions:
-
How
did the introduction of the fast rabbit to the food chain affect the
dynamics of the three populations? Why do you think this happened?
-
Compare
this simulation to the first lab simulation without fast rabbits.
How does the life expectancy change among rabbits, wolves, and grass?
Why do you think this happened?
-
List
five factors which will impact these 3 populations but which could
not be included in our simulation because of our limited ability in
a hands-on activity (ex: grass reproduction rate).
|