Grading
Rubric
|
Content |
||
|
Informative |
3 |
Contain meaningful information, clear
progression from hypothesis to conclusion |
|
2 |
Progression somewhat unclear, information not
all meaningful |
|
|
1 |
Progression choppy, information lacking |
|
|
0 |
Not able to distinguish progression,
information not meaningful |
|
|
Coherence |
3 |
On topic, no extraneous information |
|
2 |
Close to topic, little extraneous information |
|
|
1 |
Topic choppy, extraneous information |
|
|
0 |
Not able to distinguish topic, mostly
extraneous information |
|
|
Model |
3 |
Effective graphical component, clear
explanation of relationships |
|
2 |
Contains graphical component, relationships
somewhat explained |
|
|
1 |
Graphical component not related, a few
relationships explained |
|
|
0 |
Graphical component not included or very poor,
relationships not explained |
|
|
Process-Method of Inquiry |
||
|
Problem |
3 |
Identify problem in a logical statement, make
logical predictions about solving |
|
2 |
Problem and predictions somewhat logical |
|
|
1 |
Problem and predictions not logical |
|
|
0 |
Problem not identified, predictions not
realistic |
|
|
Investigation |
3 |
Observations, data and interpretation are
recorded in a orderly manner |
|
2 |
Observations, data and interpretations are
recorded but not orderly |
|
|
1 |
Some observations, data and interpretations are
recorded |
|
|
0 |
Little to no recorded information |
|
|
Conclusion |
3 |
Well formed, based on data, and realistic |
|
2 |
Based on data and somewhat realistic |
|
|
1 |
Somewhat based on data |
|
|
0 |
Not based on data and not realistic |
|
|
Accuracy |
3 |
Relationships, formula usage and concepts are
accurate |
|
2 |
Somewhat accurate |
|
|
1 |
Very little accuracy |
|
|
0 |
Not accurate |
|
|
Presentation |
||
|
Appearance |
3 |
Neat, organized |
|
|
2 |
Some organization, somewhat neat |
|
1 |
Unorganized, not neat |
|
|
0 |
No organization, not neat |
|
|
Clarity |
3 |
Readability, concise, pertinent visual aids |
|
2 |
Somewhat readable, concise, visual aid somewhat
pertinent |
|
|
1 |
Lacking good readability, conciseness, visual
aid not pertinent |
|
|
0 |
Not readable, not concise, no visual aid or it
is not pertinent |
|
|
Oral/written |
3 |
Within time limits, good poise/grammar correct |
|
2 |
Close to time limits, ok poise/few grammar
errors |
|
|
1 |
Very far from time limits, lacking poise/ several
grammar errors |
|
|
0 |
No presentation |
|
|
Creativity/ Originality |
3 |
Color usage, originality, visual aids |
|
2 |
Lacking 1 of the above |
|
|
1 |
Lacking 2 of the above |
|
|
0 |
Lacking all of the above |
|